Search for: "Ex Parte Yielding"
Results 41 - 60
of 475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2012, 10:48 am
Emotionally charged issues about your Ex should never be part of your parenting. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 6:04 am
Cir. 2007) (“[O]bvious variants of prior art references are themselves part of the public domain. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 5:53 am
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 3:10 am
Finally, with respect to ex parte reexaminations, the SNQ standard is maintained. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:17 am
The Board affirmed the Examiner in an appeal of ex parte re-exam 90/009,930, Ex parte SIMS VIBRATION LABORATORY, INC. .The subject matter is directed to an archery bow:In combination:an archery bow which comprises a riser and first andsecond limbs extending in opposite directions from opposite ends of said riser;at least one pair of components for modifying the decay patterns of the vibrations set up in the bow limbs when an arrow is released; anda component… [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:22 am
This is illustrated by Ex parte Grispo and Ex parte van der Pol. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 7:55 am
This is illustrated by Ex parte Grispo and Ex parte van der Pol. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 2:23 pm
Ekbatani lost part of his left leg below his knee due to the crash, the story reported. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 11:21 pm
Ex parte Catan (BPAI 2007). [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:00 am
The federal judiciary came off relatively unscathed - though not entirely, we got three-judge district courts, for example, in the wake of Ex Parte Young. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 6:33 am
Details: Ex parte Daks Appeal 2009007621; Appl. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:15 pm
Both KSR and Adams are cited in Ex parte Talanis :The Federal Circuit has stated that “rejections on obviousness grounds cannot be sustained by mere conclusory statements; instead, there must be some articulated reasoning with some rational underpinning to support the legal conclusion of obviousness. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:32 am
The criminal trial could have produced jail time and fines for the ex-officers, but the civil trial can only yield monetary payment and/or “equitable relief,” meaning that the court would order the defendants to do or not do something – no jail time. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm
” This was no failing on Kinnaird’s part – the hypotheticals are simply impossible to separate and the “significant risk” test has no clear demarcating line. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:23 pm
Also fined over this matter are ex-Rodman & Renshaw CCO William A. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 5:26 am
The best part is that doing so does not impact your former spouse’s ability to collect their benefits.In order to collect benefits based on your ex-spouses earnings, the following eligibility requirements must be met:You were married to your former spouse for at least 10 years and you are at least 62 years old.You have not remarried. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 12:08 pm
This is the second part of a three-part series on Judge Neil Gorsuch’s handling of cyber issues. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 8:37 am
Details: Ex parte Ryan, Jr. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 8:41 am
In Ex parte GUDRUN CLAUS-HERZ KSR is cited as to predictable results:“The combination of familiar elements according to known methods is likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 5:55 am
Appellants lose on obviousness in Ex parte MARSHALL MEDOFF .Attorney argument failsAppellants argue that it is not predictable that lignocellulosic materialwill behave the same way as cellulosic material described in the IAEAreference. [read post]
