Search for: "FIRE POWER CO., LTD."
Results 41 - 60
of 169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
Absent negligence, the duty to repair only arose once the landlord was aware that damage had been caused.On the specific leaks, he found CHA were liable in respect of the February 2005 leak, as this could and should have been remedied by 8 April 2005, not 26 April, following Duke of Westminster v Guild [1985] 1 QB 688 and Gordon and Teixeira v Selico Co Ltd (1986) 18 HLR 219On the other leaks, he found that CHA had carried out repairs in good time and that the flood from the flat… [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 2:40 am
(IP Think Tank) WIPO and patent exclusions: Public health and medical methods (Spicy IP) Wall Street Journal article under fire – access to drugs – what’s the problem? [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:20 am
Neil explains.Trowel and Error: power-tools aren't similar to manual ones, says General CourtValentina reports on another GC decision, this time in Case T-254/13 Stayer Ibérica, SA v OHIM, ZAO Korporaciya ‘Masternet’, addressing when goods are complementary or in competition for the purposes of their similarity. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
The meaning contended for by the claimant attributes to the reasonable reader the unreasonable proposition that there is “no smoke without fire” [42]. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:25 pm
Ltd. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 11:28 am
Pacific Insurance Co., Ltd., 439 F.Supp.2d 831 (W.D. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 7:29 pm
"Interestingly, both the majority and the minority employed separation of power arguments. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 10:04 am
Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Denver Mattress Co., LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) 9th Circuit: Judicial estoppel does not bar trade dress theory: Larin Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Denver Mattress Co., LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) 9th Circuit: Judicial estoppel does not bar trade dress theory: Larin Corp. v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:21 pm
The complaint alleges that MicroJet Technology Co., Ltd. of Taiwan (“MicroJet”), Asia Pacific Microsystems, Inc. of Taiwan (“APM”), Mipo Technology Limited of Hong Kong, Mipo Science & Technology Co., Ltd. of China, Mextec d/b/a Mipo America Ltd. of Miami, Florida, SinoTime Technologies, Inc. d/b/a All Colors of Miami, Florida, and PTC Holdings Limited of Hong Kong (“PTC”) (collectively “proposed… [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:48 am
Wilson & Co. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:24 am
Co., No. 08-50042 (Aug. 4, 2008), Gore Completions, Ltd. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 8:48 am
Interstate Distributor Co. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:48 am
Shortly after the start of the BP spill, it came under fire for its cozy relationships with the oil and gas companies it was suppose to regulate. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Powers, 454 F.2d 1362, 1366 (1st Cir. 1972). [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:54 pm
In the Ontario Court of Appeal case of Hobbs v TDI Canada Ltd.[3], the Plaintiff, Hobbs, was an experienced advertising salesperson who took a job with TDI Canada Ltd. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
Soul Pattinson & Co Ltd. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
The sweeping interpretation that a state court gave to a routine registration statute and an accompanying power of attorney that Pennsylvania Fire credited as a general “consent” has yielded to the doctrinal refinement reflected in [Bauman] and the Court’s 21st century approach to general and specific jurisdiction.Id. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:37 pm
Sam Ernst wrote about Boyden Power Brake Co. v. [read post]
