Search for: "FOREST LABS V US" Results 41 - 60 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2010, 9:17 pm by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
Knotts in 1983, it ruled that police use of an electronic beeper to track a suspect’s trip to a drug lab was not a search. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:32 pm by Lyle Denniston
Knotts in 1983, it ruled that police use of an electronic beeper to track a suspect’s trip to a drug lab was not a search. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:45 pm by Aaron Barkoff
  The patent owner, Forest Labs, sued Ivax on the EEP but not the LEP. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:21 am by Kelly
(Patent Docs) Namenda (Memantine) – US: Forest and Merz Pharma settle Namenda infringement dispute (Patent Docs) Naropin (Ropivacaine) – US: Patent infringement complaint filed following ANDA filing: APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:06 am by Kelly
(Patent Docs) Namenda (Memantine) – US: Mylan announces settlement agreement with Forest Lab’s and Merz Pharmaceuticals (SmartBrief) Olux-E (Clobetasol) – US: Patent infringement complaint following a Paragraph IV certification: Stiefel Laboratories Inc. et al. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
Not only that, but writing about Moreno had us looking at market share liability generally, and it just so happens that we haven’t done an analytical post on this subject in our more than three-year existence. [read post]
15 May 2010, 2:22 pm
(citing Forest Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:25 pm
Cir. 2004); Forest Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:24 pm
The ITC made a map of the territory, declared the map to be the territory, and missed the forest for the trees. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
. - Eric Watkins, Oil & Gas Journal, January 25, 2010 The US Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency said Pacific Pipeline Systems LLP, a Long Beach, Calif. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 6:46 pm
The Forest Group v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2008) (modifying an injunction’s terms on appeal); Forest Labs., Inc. v. [read post]