Search for: "Feist v. Feist"
Results 41 - 60
of 216
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2019, 5:55 am
For a work to be “original” it must be an independent creation of the author and contain sufficient creativity (Feist Publications Inc v Rural Tel. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:57 am
Nonetheless, according to Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Services (499 US 340 (1991)) (Feist) a work that combines non-protectable elements into a larger design may be registered if the overall design is sufficiently creative. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 12:27 pm
V. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
Burke, Jr. in the case of Feist v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 6:25 am
Following the US Supreme Court judgment in Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Services (499 US 340 (1991)), the term “original” entails two components: independent creation and sufficient creativity. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 10:58 am
Following the US Supreme Court judgment in Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Services (499 US 340 (1991)) (Feist) the term “original” entails two components: independent creation and sufficient creativity. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 9:56 am
Finally, UEFA argued that the Office’s assessment was not in line with US Supreme Court judgment in Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Services (499 US 340 (1991)) (Feist).The legal framework and the CORB assessmentPursuant to Section 102a of the US Copyright Act (USC), a work may be registered if it qualifies as an original work of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 6:47 am
” In our case, the Board cited Satava v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
” Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
Gibson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 6:27 am
Case citation: Ashton v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:14 am
This is the interesting question that the US Court of Appeals for the 9thCircuit recently addressed in Rentmeester v Nike. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:13 am
The case of Folkens v Wyland Worldwide LLC concerned an illustration created by Mr Folkens titled "Two Tursiops Truncatus" or otherwise known as "Two Dolphins", in the late 1970s. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
Canadian case: Cinar Corp. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:45 am
We express no opinion on whether these works are sufficiently original to qualify for copyright protection, see Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 12:56 am
As explained by the Supreme Court in Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:10 am
It’s about computation, compression, individual works—a work is only as complex as its shortest encoding.Tentative idea #1: Feist says there are hundreds of millions of ways to select 50,000 listings; about 1,500,000 bits to describe an arbitrary selection—but it’s a lot easier to describe Feist’s actual selection, and that is an indicator of lack of original creativity.Tentative idea #3: quantify factor 3: a compressed image could be seen as… [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
No substantial similarities between the two worksThe elements of a copyright infringement claim are (1) ownership of a valid copyright and (2) copying of constituent elements of the work that are original, Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:58 am
Of course, under the (circuit) law of AGU v. [read post]
