Search for: "Ford v. Kavanaugh" Results 41 - 60 of 99
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2022, 8:30 pm by Michael C. Dorf
"At the same time, however, the fact that neither President Ford nor President Carter supports [Nixon's] claim detracts from the weight of" his privilege argument.Thus, if the Court had to reach the question, Nixon v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:10 am by Josh Blackman
But the Blasey-Ford allegations, coupled with his contentious second confirmation hearing, may have changed that calculus. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports on “what could happen as the drama over Christine Blasey Ford’s accusation and Kavanaugh’s denial plays out. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:14 pm by Josh Blackman
And for those counting at home, the moderates Justices Stewart (Eisenhower) and Stevens (Ford) were in the majority. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm by Josh Blackman
But Biskupic tells us that the pain "remain[s] fresh"–for Kavanaugh, that is, not Christine Blasey Ford. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:51 am by Dan Bressler
Rossi, a partner at Conn, Kavanaugh, Rosenthal, Peisch & Ford, writes on: “Spotting and avoiding ‘material limitation’ conflicts of interest” — “Even if two clients are not directly adverse, a conflict of interest may arise if a lawyer’s ability to represent a client is materially limited by the lawyer’s other responsibilities or personal interests. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 6:09 pm
Nevertheless, the four witnesses she named could not corroborate any of the events," said Senator Susan Collins, explaining her vote for Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Progressive, Bill Blum agrees that “[i]t hasn’t taken Kavanaugh long to reveal his true ideological colors,” focusing on Kavanaugh’s dissent in June Medical Services v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm by Mark Walsh
Kavanaugh asks about President Gerald Ford’s pardon of President Richard Nixon soon after Nixon resigned in 1974. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 2:42 pm
  Or, at a minimum, shouldn't be.Take Brett Kavanaugh, for example. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm by Deborah Heller
If Brett Kavanaugh is not confirmed by the Senate, the Court would have only 8 Justices and be at risk of having some split (4-4) decisions. [read post]
23 May 2019, 10:03 am by Adam Feldman
(A good example of surprising voting coalitions that led to these fractures is Stokeling v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
Scott Oswald argues that Comcast v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” At ThinkProgress, Zack Ford notes that “[t]he Supreme Court is now being asked to consider five different cases related to LGBTQ rights this session. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 7:40 pm by Howard Bashman
” Matt Ford of The New Republic reports that “The Supreme Court Could Spring an Abortion Rights Trap; The high court’s taken a dim view of targeted regulation of abortion providers in the past, but that was before Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Christine Blasey Ford. [read post]