Search for: "Frazier v. New York" Results 41 - 47 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States Issue: Whether, if a defendant violates the terms of supervised release, a district court may base the new sentence upon factors stated in 18 U.S.C. 3553(a)(2)(A). [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 12:20 pm by Phil Dixon
Denial of Due Process challenge by pretrial detainees against county’s use of Pretrial Services lacked findings of fact and conclusions of law; vacated and remanded Frazier v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
New York,3 that the Supreme Court matter-of-factly held that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment was “of course” applicable to the states.4 To justify incorporation, Penn Central cited only one 19th century case, which itself did not mention the Fifth Amendment.5 Before Penn Central, the Court relied on the Due Process Clause to restrict the scope of state taking power. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
New Technology Requires New Regulatory Ambitions October 9, 2023 | Kevin Frazier, Crump College of Law of St. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In 2015, the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division – First Department, was faced with two matters, both of which addressed whether bonds issued to entities formed for the purposes of investing and trading in securities, covered losses the entities sustained by investing in Madoff’s Ponzi scheme.[7]  In 2009, Madoff pleaded guilty to 11 federal felonies and was sentenced to 150 years in prison, the maximum allowed. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]