Search for: "Frye v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 256
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
Over 25 years ago, the United States Supreme Court answered a narrow legal question about whether the so-called Frye rule was incorporated into Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am by Schachtman
”13 Mandatory Not Precatory The better reasoned cases decided under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, and state-court analogues, follow the Reference Manual in making clear that confounding factors must be carefully addressed and eliminated. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 11:22 am by Christine Corcos
Tompkins (1938), the United States Supreme Court famously reversed, holding that federal courts sitting in diversity must apply state substantive law, not federal "general common law. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 11:22 am
Tompkins (1938), the United States Supreme Court famously reversed, holding that federal courts sitting in diversity must apply state substantive law, not federal "general common law. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:59 am by Schachtman
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert is now over 25 years old. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Tompkins (1938), the United States Supreme Court famously reversed, holding that federal courts sitting in diversity must apply state substantive law, not federal "general common law. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:26 pm by The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.
Prior to 1993, the determination of whether scientific evidence should be allowed followed the “Frye” method, so named for the 1923 case of Frye v. [read post]