Search for: "Fund v. City of Atlanta" Results 41 - 60 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  In his judgement Mr Justice Saini drew the same conclusions for one of the talks and one tweet, that in the context of the entire speech the words used in fact meant there were “substantial grounds to investigate” whether Banks would be willing to accept Russian government funds, in violation of prohibitions on foreign electoral funding. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Steven Taber
Click here to read more Expiration of Funds Leads to Rush on Runway. --- Christine Cullen, OceanCity Today, February 26, 2010 Ocean City in Maryland is rushing to reconfigure a runway at Ocean City Municipal Airport, to prevent losing $2.8 million from an account dedicated to airport improvements. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Andrew’s in the Pines Anglican Church, Fayette County, GA, Superior Court, Civil Action No. 2007-V0272C, October 2007; plaintiff was the Episcopal Diocese of Atlanta; parish left its property behind and formed a CANA congregation34. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Conservatives in Congress would prefer to disband the fund and repurpose its money. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 7:35 am
I argue that more such suits should be immediately initiated by cities such as Camden, Trenton, and Newark. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by Schachtman
The Trump administration anticipated the large uptick in mail-in ballots by manipulating the Post Office’s funding, by anticipatory charges of fraud in mail-in procedures, and by spreading lies and disinformation about COVID-19, along with spreading the infection itself. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by admin
The Trump administration anticipated the large uptick in mail-in ballots by manipulating the Post Office’s funding, by anticipatory charges of fraud in mail-in procedures, and by spreading lies and disinformation about COVID-19, along with spreading the infection itself. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]