Search for: "GENERAL ELECTRIC CO v. USA" Results 41 - 60 of 129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2015, 7:57 pm by Schachtman
Clearly, there are some cases, like General Electric v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 2010 WL 2640170, at *2 (W.D. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Quebecor World (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 10:06 am by Michelle Yeary
Warner Electric Brake & Clutch Co, 605 N.E.2d 1032 (Ill. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 11:17 am by John J. Sullivan
Teva Pharmas., USA, Inc., 2012 WL 5364392 (M.D. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
(electric wheelchair) Deposition2005-11-09 Buonocore v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
The following cases excluded or limited expert witness opinion testimony with respect to epidemiological studies that the court concluded were not sufficiently similar to the facts of the case to warrant the admission of an expert’s opinion based on their results: SUPREME COURT General Electric Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by Bexis
(electric wheelchair) Deposition2005-11-09 Buonocore v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm by war
It is correct to say that deceptive similarity is a question for the tribunal of fact and is not a matter for any witness to decide but, as the passage cited by Gummow J from Lord Diplock’s judgment in General Electric Co (USA) v General Electric Co Ltd [1972] 1 WLR 729 at 738 makes plain, to say that a question is for the tribunal of fact or to describe it as a “jury question” does not mean that evidence going… [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:54 am by Lovechilde
Measured in terms of money spent, the Chamber is by far the most powerful lobby in Washington, DC, spending $770.6 million since 1998, over three times the amount spent by General Electric, the second-largest spender. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:39 am by Adam Chandler
Greenwire’s Lawrence Hurley (via the New York Times) discusses the impact of the Court’s decision in the greenhouse-gas case American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]