Search for: "Gee v. Gee"
Results 41 - 60
of 465
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2020, 6:39 am
Iguana tell you a story . . .State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 7:56 am
I would highly recommend Kevin Sheerin…” Gabriel V. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 9:21 am
In Kirk Kara Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 12:37 pm
Gee on September 26, 2018, before the dismemberment case was argued. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
[After two days of hero worship for Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Gorsuch, day three dumps on the Junior Justice.] [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 6:15 am
I would highly recommend Kevin Sheerin…” Gabriel V. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 7:54 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its highly anticipated opinion in June Medical Services v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac injury, constitute the… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
8 May 2020, 8:10 am
In Moss v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
Gee. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:57 am
Gee The challenged Louisiana abortion law, La. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:49 pm
While some groups had early success, United States District Court Judge Dolly Gee denied a request by Uber and Postmates to preliminarily enjoin enforcement of AB 5 against them while their constitutional challenge to the law plays out, in Olson, et al. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 10:26 am
Many eyes are on June Medical v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:02 am
“America May Be Nearing the End of the Roe Era; June Medical Services v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 5:51 am
State of California, February 10, 2020, Gee, D.). [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 1:11 pm
Gee with 70 and Bostock v. [read post]
