Search for: "Generes v. Justice Court (People) (1980)"
Results 41 - 60
of 722
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Frenemies at Last?: How Legislative History Could Save Justice Kavanaugh’s Opinion in Azar v. Allina
13 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Yet, in Azar v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 7:58 am
(Back in the 1970s and 1980s, Justice White also powerfully criticized Sullivan, and drew some support from Chief Justice Burger.) [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am
Writing for the Court, Chief Justice Rehnquist “emphasized that any restriction on a legislator’s freedom undermines the ‘public good’ by interfering with the rights of the people to representation in the democratic process. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:27 pm
In Bostock v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:11 pm
In my own observations, even among FedSoc types,there is a divide between those of the Reagan generation who hold up Burke as a paragon of judicial virtue, and those who are more in the Cato/Institute for Justice crowd who are not afraid of courts stepping out to strike down popularly elected laws that violate the Constitution. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
That ruling, U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:22 am
Woodson (1980), Rush v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
(People v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, in a draft opinion obtained and published this week by Politico, detailed his justifications for overturning Roe v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 12:01 pm
” Or, after Lee v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Joseph FishkinMost writers and scholars (perhaps most people in general?) [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Pettkus v Becker, [1980] 2 SCR 834 is perhaps the most well-known family law example of the tragic consequences of ignoring a survivor’s experience.[1] Less well-known, are the cases developing the law governing domestic contracts. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:58 am
Prince Edward Island (PEISC (AD)) (aff’d by the Supreme Court of Canada) and the BC Court of Appeal decision in R. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980); and a third based on United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
But the Supreme Court wrote, in an opinion by Justice William J. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 11:47 am
In 2017, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case and then sent it back to the lower court for another look in light of Ziglar v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:13 am
In 2010, in Graham v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Restricting service on the High Court to a set number of years, combined with a plan for the regular replacement of retiring justices, would ensure that no single justice wields too much power for too long, while simultaneously injecting new, diverse blood into that important tribunal. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In dismissing the appeal, Mr Justice Jay held that Mrs Potter could not rely on the LA 1980, s 32(1)(b) by itself (as there was no duty to disclose the commission under the general law) but could rely on the LA 1980, s 32(2). [read post]
