Search for: "Goldfarb v. Goldfarb" Results 41 - 60 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2009, 1:19 pm
Goldfarb, Binyamin Appelbaum and David Cho wrote an article on May 20, 2009. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
Georgia and Texas v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 5:45 pm
Bard Peripheral Vascular v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 8:17 am by Amy Howe
” At The Hill’s Pundits Blog, Ronald Goldfarb weighs in on the upcoming oral argument in Town of Greece v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, even accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, the complaint fails to allege the existence of an attorney-client relationship, privity, or a relationship that otherwise closely resembles privity between the plaintiffs and Leavitt (see DeMartino v Golden, 150 AD3d 1200, 1201 [2017]; Fredriksen v Fredriksen, 30 AD3d at 371-372; Goldfarb v Schwartz, 26 AD3d 462, 463 [2006]; Rovello v Klein, 304 AD2d at 638-639). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:15 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) FJ Chalke Ltd & Anor v Revenue & Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 313 (25 March 2010) Mason v Richard Freeman & Co (a firm) [2010] EWCA Civ 287 (25 March 2010) Bury Metropolitan Borough Council v Gibbons [2010] EWCA Civ 327 (26 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kirman, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 614 (25 March 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) London Borough of Hillingdon & Ors, R (on the application of)… [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 5:34 pm by Howard Bashman
At the “Language Log” blog, Mark Liberman had a post about the Clement v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [1st Dept 2016]; Cascardo v Dratel, 171 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2019]; see CPLR 3211[a][1], [7]). [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 3:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Even accepting plaintiff’s contention that the law firm defendant breached the specific provision of the retainer agreement requiring “representation at closing” (see generally Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [2016]), plaintiff failed to establish that the breach was the [*2]proximate cause of the damages complained of – the cost to replace the roof of the property purchased. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 2:47 am by John Steele
Smith pronounced himself pleased to have “knocked a little sense into the legal profession and bust at least one of its cosy little practices”.Smith's unwillingness to play along, even when it wouldn't have cost all that much, reminds of Goldfarb v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, even accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, the complaint fails to allege the existence of an attorney-client relationship, privity, or a relationship that otherwise closely resembles privity between the plaintiffs and Leavitt (see DeMartino v Golden, 150 AD3d 1200, 1201; Fredriksen v Fredriksen, 30 AD3d at 371-372; Goldfarb v Schwartz, 26 AD3d 462, 463; Rovello v Klein, 304 AD2d at 638-639). [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 3:07 am by Amy Howe
At LAWnLinguistics, Neal Goldfarb discusses the brief that he filed in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
G & J Indus., Inc. (1999), 131 Ohio App.3d 106, 721 N.E.2d 1084 (upholding an attorney-fee provision in an accounts-receivable finance agreement); 3) Goldfarb v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:09 am by Nabiha Syed
At The Hill’s Pundits Blog, Ronald Goldfarb recounts an oral argument in front of Justice William O. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 2:53 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Goldfarb, 154 F.3d 1321, 1327 (Fed. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:21 pm by Colin O'Keefe
POM Finds Class Decertification Wonderful – Seattle attorney Richard Goldfarb of Stoel Rives on the firm’s Food Liability Law Blog Did the US Supreme Court’s ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]