Search for: "Grant v. Board of Retirement" Results 41 - 60 of 1,020
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2016, 12:57 pm by Howard Knopf
That conversation may now become even more urgent in light of the most recent decision of the SCC dealing with a Board decision, namely CBC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:55 am
The Fourteenth Amendment means that a local or state government employer may not involuntarily retire a public employee from his or her work without due process of law, citing Board of Regents v Roth, 408 U.S. 564 and Cleveland Board of Education v Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532; and3. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Auburn Regional Medical Center (Granted )Docket: 11-1231Issue(s): Whether the 180-day statutory time limit for filing an appeal with the Provider Reimbursement Review Board from a final Medicare payment determination made by a fiscal intermediary, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Auburn Regional Medical Center (Granted )Docket: 11-1231Issue(s): Whether the 180-day statutory time limit for filing an appeal with the Provider Reimbursement Review Board from a final Medicare payment determination made by a fiscal intermediary, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Reducing or discontinuing a NYSHIP participating employer's contributions towards a retired employee's health insurance premiumWeaver, et al, v Town of N. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:12 am
However, in City School District of City of Emira v Newcomb, 266 A.D.2d 622, the Appellate Division said that: “… authority exists to support the general proposition that a retirement letter may be withdrawn prior to a legally binding acceptance by a board of education,” citing Matter of Totevski v Board of Educ., 178 Misc 2d 758; Matter of Petnick, 14 Educ Dept Rep 141; Matter of Goodrow, 7 Educ Dept Rep 39; and Matter of Lawrence, 6… [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 7:40 pm by Kirk Jenkins
On the final argument day of the May term, the Illinois Supreme Court heard argument in Prazen v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:23 am
Withdrawing from membership in a New York State public retirement systemRichardson v NYC Employees’ Retirement System, NYS Supreme Court, Justice Gammerman, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]A member of a public retirement system may lose his or her eligibility for significant benefits if he or she decides to withdraw his or her contributions upon leaving public employment. [read post]