Search for: "Grant v. Commissioner of Correction "
Results 41 - 60
of 481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2024, 9:16 am
The Supreme Court cited with approval its previous guidance given in the case of Fowler v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2020] UKSC 22 on the application of deeming provisions in legislation. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:46 am
In this post, Jack Prytherch, Of Counsel in the Tax team at CMS, comments on the Supreme Court’s decision in Moulsdale t/a Moulsdale Properties v Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2023] UKSC 12, which was handed down on 22 March 2023. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:17 pm
This includes the key High Court decisions in National Resource Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents [1959] HCA 67 (‘NRDC’) and D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc [2015] HCA 35 (‘Myriad’), in which the Court proceeded on the basis – as the Full Court put it at [116] – that ‘human agency was required in the development of the invention in suit’. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 10:16 am
Commissioner, 152 T.C. at 9 and no. 6 (quoting Molasky v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:31 am
Judge Halpern granted Summary Judgment in favor of the Commissioner and in so doing said: Appeals determined the assessments were correct, and we see no error in that determination. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Dep't of Correction v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
Chapter V does expressly apply to the Crown but [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 10:18 am
Snodgrass v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:33 am
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:51 am
Section 36 provides for the Commissioner to make determinations regarding the correct ‘eligible persons’ on a patent application, i.e. the persons (natural or corporate) entitled by invention, assignment or other transfer of title, to be the owner of any patent ultimately granted. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 10:53 pm
For the Constitutional Court to grant the reliefs sought, it first needed to grant Villa Crop leave to appeal. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 8:55 am
In so doing, the Tribunal made the same error of law that this court corrected in the case of 3437400 Canada Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:30 am
The preamble to the regulations made a reference to Robinson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:48 am
The Court of Appeal agreed with the FTT and ruled that the scheme was not abusive and so the Supreme Court had to decide if the Court of Appeal was correct to reinstate the FTT ruling. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:30 am
") AC31298 - Griffin v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 11:55 am
Commissioner Rosch v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 8:42 am
") AC31368 - Asif v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 4:49 pm
Balm ;Road Investment, LLC v Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners, 2020 WL 413683 (FL App. 2/11/2022) [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 11:40 am
") AC31763 - Zollo v. [read post]
