Search for: "Grant v. Georgia-Pacific Corp."
Results 41 - 60
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Collective Scienter does not apply to false patent marking: Heathcote Holdings Corp. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:55 am
Cir. 2015)) have looked to traditional methodologies for determining reasonable royalty patent damages, including the 15-factor Georgia-Pacific framework. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:52 pm
Gemini, who testified that damages should be $564,946,803 based upon a hypothetical negotiation between the parties (and the Georgia-Pacific factors). [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:56 pm
Gemini, who testified that damages should be $564,946,803 based upon a hypothetical negotiation between the parties (and the Georgia-Pacific factors). [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
Performance Radiator Pacific, LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Susan G. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:52 am
Reasonable royalty analysis (Georgia-Pacific factors) Lucent v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 7:30 pm
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm
Boyd (Internet Cases) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Groupon – Groupon-offering Photog causes plagiarism stir (PlagiarismToday) US Trademarks Reputational risk 101 – Craig’s List (Business IP and Intangible Assets Report and Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions Georgia Pacific’s Effort to Control Towel Dispenser Refills Fails in 8th Circuit: Georgia Pacific v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
” McFarlin v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 5:26 pm
" (quoting Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:34 am
Mobil Oil Corp., 7 N.Y.3d 434 (2006), and Cornell v. 360 W. 51st St. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:27 am
Meyer, Ravgen’s damages expert, provided a reasonable royalty opinion based on a Georgia-Pacific hypothetical negotiation analysis. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am
The Lear Corp. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
Dr. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton (Patents Post Grant Blog) (Patently-O) Change in patent reexamination stalls Texas litigation: SouthWire Company v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court will hear Harrington v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 3:16 pm
Microsoft Corp. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:28 am
District Court for the Northern District of New York in March 2009, Rader granted judgment as a matter of law in Cornell v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (Afro-IP),If education and pricing policy fail, says Adobe in Nigeria, we can still sue: (Afro-IP),South African arm of Chrysler objects to advertisement by Indian vehicle maker Mahindra and Mahindra that uses the term "jeep": (Afro-IP), (Spicy IP),Kenya’s call for anti-counterfeit legislation… amongst other changes: (Afro-IP),Kenya: Shared computer use raises privacy, confidentiality issues: (Afro-IP)AustraliaChanges to grace period for trade mark renewal:… [read post]
