Search for: "HILL v. COLE" Results 41 - 60 of 83
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and Sophia Cole of The Cato Institute summarize an amicus brief they recently filed in McCutcheon v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
Resolved cases included: Chris Magee v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 22/02/2013; Mr Nicholas Thomas v The Independent, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Steven Wolf v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Mr Orhan Bicer v Middleton Guardian, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Mr Darren Meldrum v The Scottish Sun, Clause 3, 21/02/2013; Mr Simon Sanderson v Daily Mail, Clauses 1, 12, 21/02/2013; Mr William McNee v Daily Record, Clauses 3, 6, 21/02/2013; Mr William McNee… [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:06 am by Kiran Bhat
CrimProf Blog reviews an article by David Cole on the place of Holder v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
  Bias and confounding must be considered, along with other Bradford Hill factors. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
However, the courts have held that injunctions against certain statements based on a finding on the merits that those particular statements are defamatory effectively do not amount to prior restraints and are therefore not presumptively unconstitutional (see Balboa Island Village Inn v Lemen 156 P 3d 339 (Supreme Court of California, 2007); St James Healthcare v Cole 2008 MT 453 (Supreme Court of Montana, 2008); Hill v Petrotech Resources Corp (Supreme… [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 7:41 am by Carter Wood
Reid this morning stressed his desire to move on nominations, again citing Deputy Attorney General nominee James Cole as a priority. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 9:55 pm by Simon Gibbs
In one recent set of Replies I received the following cases were referred to: Bailey v IBC Vehicles Ltd, Cole v News Group Newspapers, Carpenter v Mid-Kent Healthcare Trust, William Patterson v Cape Darlington & Ors, Mattel Inc & Ors v RSW Group plc, Ghannouchi v Houni, Francis v Francis and Dickerson, Smith Graham v The Lord Chancellor’s Department and Crane v Canons Leisure Centre. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:12 am by Jeff Gamso
In a per curiam opinion (that either means one that nobody wants to admit to having written or it means that the panel wants to emphasize that it is speaking with one voice) Judges Martin, Boggs fergodssake, and Cole hold that police need some justification before breaking down the door and entering a private residence.The case is United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 9:01 pm by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) Marcus Cole reflects movingly on McDonald v City of Chicago in A Word of Thanks to Four Black Men and A Gun. [read post]