Search for: "HOWE v. MARTIN"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,355
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2007, 10:34 am
A MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY ESSAY, from Jeff Goldstein. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:43 am
In the 1991 Term, at age 31, he argued Wade v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:51 pm
In Ricci v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:06 pm
Lockheed Martin Corp. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 9:57 am
Jane LambertAppointed Person (Mr Martin Howe QC) BVG Group Ltd, v Magee O-222-20 6 Oct 2020This was an appeal to the Appointed Person by Mr Peter Magee against the decision of Mr Mark King to declare invalid registered design number 4009288 invalid (see BVG Group Ltd. v Magee O/713/19 22 Nov 2019).The hearing officer held that the design did not satisfy section 1C (1) of the Registered Designs [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:53 pm
(Lockheed Martin, Corp. v. [read post]
24 May 2025, 12:16 pm
Campos v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 4:25 am
Jane Lambert Appointed Person (Mr Martin Howe QC) Re Registered Design No 6045074, Lambretta Club Great Britain v Frankland BL 0-129-20 6 March 2020 This was an appeal to the Appointed Person by Mr Gavin Frankland against the decision of Mr Oliver Morris on behalf of the Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks in Re Registered Design No 6045074, Lambretta Club Great [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 8:15 am
In Haaland v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 10:41 am
Loyal Law Blog readers might remember John Martin, the former U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:04 am
Kouruklis did not know how [he] had done so. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 3:24 pm
On remand following a GVR, the Sixth Circuit applied Abbott but two judges, Boyce Martin and Gilbert Merritt, just had to let the Justices how wrong they were. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 2:14 am
” This was exactly the question faced by by the New York County Supreme Court, Criminal Term in People v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 9:03 pm
Martin v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 12:50 pm
”) (quoting Abbas v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
However: (1) the social benefit in having a truthful depiction of King's actual words would be much greater than the copyright owners' loss, and (2) it is not required that all four fair use factors weigh in favour of a finding of fair use, as recent judgments, eg Cariou v Prince [here] or Seltzer v Green Day [here], demonstrate. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:18 am
Here is how Mr. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 6:41 am
Stanford student Martine Cicconi summarizes Monday’s opinion in Bobby v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:25 am
Martin J. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
The court recited how Church Mutual and those with Engle Martin followed this pattern of property adjustment: Mr. [read post]
