Search for: "HUGHES v. DOLLAR GENERAL"
Results 41 - 60
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2021, 8:58 pm
Only two members had changed (Hughes to Jackson, and McReynolds to Rutledge). [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Bork v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 11:32 am
It's not really "product liability," but in terms of sheer impact and dollar value, this one belongs on top. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
., JAMES NEESE, DAVID NEESE, JENNIFER HUGHES, MITZI RENFROE, AND IRL HOOPER, Appellants, v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
Casey and Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Deshaney v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Written by Mark V. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
” That royalty is no pittance: In Hughes Aircraft v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
Rather, the calculation of damages necessarily requires speculation regarding what price the parties would have negotiated if the data had been disclosed.[20] The Government has the burden to show “by some reasonable method” the amount it believes the final contract price was overstated.[21] There is a rebuttable presumption that the “natural and probable consequence” of defective cost or pricing data is a “dollar for dollar” increase in the… [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 6:36 pm
Hughes Training, Inc., 36 F.3d 336, 345-49 (4th Cir. 1994); Gibbs v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:11 am
IMO Probate of Alleged Will of Hughes, 244 N.J. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
., JAMES NEESE, DAVID NEESE, JENNIFER HUGHES, MITZI RENFROE, AND IRL HOOPER, Appellants, v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am
How we deal with the free rider being the TM owner—Packman v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:24 pm
The feds seem to understand, however, that aggressively pursuing legal medical marijuana sales – and the revenue generated for states and municipalities – won’t make the dollars generated from those sales go away. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 7:18 am
Read Senator Hugh Segal’s stirring speech against Bill C-377 here. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am
Hoffman v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Generally, a process server’s affidavit of service establishes a prime facie case as to the method of service and, therefore, gives rise to a presumption of proper serviceIn Matter of Reyes v Munoz, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 5226157 (Mem), 2021 N.Y. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 12:59 pm
An unprecedented cost award on a summary judgment motion recently in Hughes v. [read post]
