Search for: "Harris v. Super. Ct."
Results 41 - 60
of 72
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2012, 7:31 am
Harris v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:54 am
Harris v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am
Many cases allow people who allege they had been sexually assaulted to be pseudonymous,[1] including when they are defendants being sued for libel and related torts.[2] Indeed, some allow pseudonymity for the alleged attacker as well as the alleged victim, if the two had been spouses or lovers in the past, because identifying one would also identify the other, at least to people who had known the couple.[3] But again, many other cases hold otherwise, some in highly prominent cases (for instance,… [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 10:39 am
Ct. 2473, 2489, 189 L. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Aug. 23, 1999) (“plaintiff has not produced evidence of an alternative design”; “testimony goes to an alternative treatment [is] not an alternative design”); Harris v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:19 am
Super. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Harris, Michael Ray. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
Super Ct. 1993). [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:18 am
Super Ct. 1993). [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Super. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
Super. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 5:21 am
App. 4th 678, 682 (citing to Harris v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 1:00 pm
Super. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 8:37 am
Relying on Harris v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:47 pm
Super. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
" The document names Harry W. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Ct. 1187 (2009), and Riegel v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:45 am
Ct. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 2:27 pm
Super. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am
In Department of Fair Employment and Housing v Cathy’s Creations Inc (CA Super Ct Oct 21, 2022) the court concluded that the Department had failed to prove intentional sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]
