Search for: "Healy v Healy" Results 41 - 60 of 222
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2022, 1:36 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Orin Kerr analyzed an Eastern District of Virginia judge’s ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 2:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court cited the key First Amendment K-12 student cases, and also noted that two college student cases that provided still clearer protection for college students: In Healy v. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
.), MontréalDécision de : Juges Martin Vauclair, Patrick Healy et Stephen W. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 6:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant failed to provide any expert testimony (see Healy v Finz & Finz, P.C., 82 AD3d 704, 706 [2011]; Northrop v Thorsen, 46 AD3d 780, 782 [2007]) or to otherwise substantiate her claim of legal malpractice. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 11:52 am
  Which also seems definitely true.The opinion is a fairly damning indictment of the trial judge, Dan Healy (up in Solano County). [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
It’s Critics of Political Correctness Who Shrink from the Values of Free and Robust Expression, Thomas Healy, Seton Hall University – School of Law. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am by Randy E. Barnett
(2015) Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015) Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016) Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015) Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am by Schachtman
Previously, only companies with federal contracts were subject to regulations and inspections under the Walsh-Healy Act. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Briefly: A pair of longform pieces investigates the legal impact of the Supreme Court’s July 9 ruling in McGirt v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, the sellers failed to raise a triable issue of fact, since they did not produce any expert evidence regarding whether Goodman’s conduct constituted malpractice and caused the sellers to incur damages, and under the circumstances of this case, such expert evidence was required for an evaluation of the adequacy and propriety of Goodman’s actions (see Healy v Finz & Finz, P.C., 82 AD3d 704, 706; Northrop v Thorsen, 46 AD3d 780,… [read post]