Search for: "Heard v. Frye"
Results 41 - 55
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
“A party will not be heard to complain of the violation of another person’s constitutional rights. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:50 pm
City of Chicago, 771 NE 2d 1030 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 4th Div. 2002 “Illinois law is unequivocal: the exclusive test for the admission of expert testimony is governed by the standard first expressed in Frye v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
CVS Pharmacy, 764 N.E.2d 814, 819-20 (Mass. 2002); Frye v. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 11:30 am
Something someone experienced first-hand is more reliable than something they merely heard about second-hand (hearsay). [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 2:33 pm
Porter v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Frye (Winston Salem, NC)Capitol v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
In Capital v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:33 am
New York is, like Pennsylvania and New Jersey, a Frye state (as in, Frye v United States, 293 F 1013) that permits “expert testimony based on scientific principles, procedures, or theories only after the principles, procedures, or theories have gained general acceptance in the relevant scientific field. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
But we have not heard any in-house corporate lawyer talk that way for at least ten years. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
The following is a glossary of a broad list of legal terms, civil and criminal, state and federal and not just those in a divorce or family law case. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]
