Search for: "Herring v. Coughlin" Results 41 - 60 of 82
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2014, 2:01 pm
In Jones-Ledbetter v Biltmore Auto Sales, Inc. the plaintiff filed an action basing venue on her residence in Bronx County, a mere three months after moving to Bronx County from Westchester County. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 10:41 pm
Under SCPA 405, the guardian ad litem is entitled to a fee for his or her services rendered. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:42 pm
Under SCPA 405, the guardian ad litem is entitled to a fee for his or her services rendered. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 10:45 pm
Under SCPA 405, the guardian ad litem is entitled to a fee for his or her services rendered. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:52 pm
Under SCPA 405, the guardian ad litem is entitled to a fee for his or her services rendered. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:42 pm
Under SCPA 405, the guardian ad litem is entitled to a fee for his or her services rendered. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, the employee was told that if he did not submit his resignation immediately he would be served with disciplinary charges. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" * In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, the court said that the threat to file formal disciplinary charges if the employee did not resign does not constitute duress as it is not duress to threaten to do what one has the legal right to do.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2014/2014_01905.htm===================The Discipline Book, - a concise guide to disciplinary actions involving public employees in New York State. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
On 11 April 2000, the will was admitted to probate and on the same date, a letters testamentary was issued to B, her son. [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:41 am
" In contrast, the Appellate Division, citing Rychlick v Coughlin, 99 AD2d 863, affd. 63 NY2d 643, explained that "it has consistently been held that a threat to do that which one has the legal right to do does not constitute duress. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
” NYPPL Comment: On the issue of coercion in connection with an appointing authority’s threatening disciplinary action if the employee does not resign from his or her position, the Court of Appeals has held that threatening to do what the appointing authority had a right to do -- i.e., file disciplinary charges -- did not constitute coercion so as to make the resignation involuntary [Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643]. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:58 am
Appointing authority threatening to do what it has a legal right to do is not “coercion”Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643 Suppose an employee entitled to pre-termination “notice and hearing” is told that unless he or she immediately resigns from his or her position, he or she will be served with disciplinary charges. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:27 am
Citing Griffin v Coughlin, 88 NY2d 674, the Appellate Division pointed out that “[t]here is no firmer or more settled principle of Establishment Clause jurisprudence than that prohibiting the use of the State’s power to force one to profess a religious belief. [read post]