Search for: "Holder v. Smith" Results 41 - 60 of 576
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2022, 6:15 am by Astrid Reisinger Coracini
The understanding of aggression, the collective act underlying the crime, has remained virtually unchanged in GA Resolution 3314 and Article 8bis(2) of the ICC Statute since it was first introduced by a Soviet diplomat in 1933 and was found to reflect customary law by the International Court of Justice (Nicaragua v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
” Now leading precedent in Canadian Aboriginal law, the decision produced in Delgamuukw v British Columbia has been cited countless times in both the courts and the legal academy. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
 The Korf court found this protocol sufficient because it gave the privilege holder a right to object to disclosure. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
As IPKat explains, Kelis is not the rights holder of the song: her problem is with her producers, not Beyoncé. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian has a report on the evidence of Assistant Defence Minister Andrew Hastie at the defamation trial of Ben Roberts-Smith. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 10:36 am by Eric Goldman
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Phil Dixon
Summaries will also be posted to Smith’s Case Compendium, here. (1) Sufficient evidence supported dogfighting convictions; (2) Leading question during State’s direct examination was not error; (3) The trial court did not err by ordering restitution for all the seized animals or by failing to explicitly consider the defendant’s ability to pay, but erred in converting the restitution award to a civil judgment absent statutory authorization State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
Norwegian goes on to cite the decision in Armor Screen Corp. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]