Search for: "Hopkins v. Strong"
Results 41 - 60
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
Furthermore, the Court observed that there were strong public policy and practical reasons for addressing the issue of invalidity regardless of the outcome of the question of infringement. 508 U.S. at 102-01. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
In Ulane v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:26 am
• The Court rejected Ms Hopkins’ argument that the tweets did not cause serious harm on the basis that they were only published to readers who would already have strong views on the Claimant either way. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
The “Twitter Libel” case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins continued to take the media law headlines this week. [read post]
Case Report: Monroe v Hopkins, Days 1 and 2: claimant’s evidence and defendant’s closing submissions
28 Feb 2017, 4:16 pm
The trial of the case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins (see our case preview from last Friday) began on Monday 27 February 2017 before Mr Justice Warby in Court 13 at the Royal Courts of Justice. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
Hopkins, that sex stereotyping is a form of intentional sex discrimination that violates Title VII, the broad employment discrimination law. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
In Porter v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Today’s live blog team comprises Anthony Fairclough (Matrix), Emma Boffey, Lisa Fox, and Diane Jerry (from CMS) as well as Cathryn Hopkins, Ryan Dolby-Stevens and Tom Pritchard (all from Olswang). 16.10 Lord Neuberger thanks all the court staff and lawyers for their hard work in bringing the case. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:13 am
The opinion calls it strong evidence of congressional intent. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:48 pm
The Facts of the Case In the case of Rayner v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 2:15 pm
Price suggested that perhaps the Court did not foresee strong differences in opinion between the branches arising, as they did last year in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:58 pm
The Associated Press describes President Xi’s move as “displaying both his strong personal authority and China’s determination to defend its interests” and “bolsters his status as China’s most powerful leader in decades and comes at a time when Beijing is becoming increasingly bold in its territorial asser [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am
Tas is a Turkish researcher representing himself pro se in the interference case against Johns Hopkins. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
Before the Supreme Court term commences next week, Cathryn Hopkins and Ryan Dolby-Stevens take the opportunity to look back at some of the key judgments that the Court handed down in 2015 in the areas of contract law, public law, tort and fraud, and highlight the points for commercial law practitioners to be aware of. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:01 pm
Susan flagged the Department of Justice’s motion to vacate the preliminary injunction in Klayman v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Hopkins, are less surprising. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In Cruzan v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In this case, Young v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am
Latimer v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 2:20 pm
But you should discard any pills that have become discolored, turned powdery, or smell strong; any liquids that appear cloudy or filmy; or any tubes of cream that are hardened or cracked.But Texas has done much more than the visual and olfactory inspection Johns Hopkins advises. [read post]
