Search for: "House v. Hastings" Results 41 - 60 of 279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2015, 4:24 am by Matthew Perry, Olswang LLP
He also considered the two Privy Council decisions of BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings [1997] UKPC 13  and Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10, the effects of which meant that to imply a term, it must be reasonable and equitable, be necessary to give business efficacy to the contract and effectively be a term that ‘goes without saying’. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 2:21 pm
Two of the lecturers are A-list celebrities of L'Affaire Charney: Zachary Fasman of Paul Hastings (at right), who represents the embattled megafirm; and Theodore Rogers of Sullivan & Cromwell, who is working on the case in-house. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:58 am by admin
So there you are v’rooming along down the highway when clunk! [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The court correctly found the complaint time-barred under CPLR 202, New York’s “borrowing statute,” which requires a claim to be timely under both the New York limitations period and that of the jurisdiction where the claim is alleged to have arisen (Kat House Prods., LLC v Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP, 71 AD3d 580 [1st Dept 2010]). [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 2:05 pm by Giles Peaker
Bayani (1990) 22 HLR 406, and Cramp v Hastings Borough Council [2005] H.L.R. 48. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Corp. v Triarc Corp., 93 NY2d 525, 529 [1999]; see Kat House Prods., LLC v Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP, 71 AD3d 580 [1st Dept 2010]). [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 11:01 am by Giles Peaker
” This also applied to Part VII Housing Act 1996 inquiries – R v Kensington and Chelsea LBC, Ex p Bayani (1990) 22 HLR 406; Cramp v Hastings BC (2005) EWCA Civ 1005, (2005) HLR 48 at [58]; Williams v Birmingham City Council (2007) EWCA Civ 691, (2008) HLR 4. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
Only then was he allowed to return to his house—nearly 48 hours after being excluded. . . .Officer Perez testified that he was never taught at the police academy that “'time was of the essence’ once the police have secured a premises” or “that the police had to act with deliberate haste to obtain the warrant. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am by Elizabeth Goitein
As the report explains, the House judiciary and intelligence committees formed a joint working group to examine Section 702, a controversial surveillance authority scheduled to expire on Dec. 31. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 1:21 pm by Evan Lee
Evan Lee is a professor of law emeritus at UC Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 8:34 am by WIMS
<> Members Introduce Four Common Sense Bills to Update the Endangered Species Act - House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Doc Hastings (WA-04), Rep. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 2:05 pm by Giles Peaker
 The Judge was wrong to find as a matter of law and fact that Ground 8 in Schedule 2 to Housing Act 1988 was proven. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:54 am by admin
So there you are v’rooming along down the highway when clunk! [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm by NL
Pieretti v London Borough of Enfield [2010] EWCA Civ 1104 This is an odd case, in lots of ways, but what is decided in this appeal to the Court of Appeal is potentially of broader significance and certainly useful as clarification. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 11:01 am by Victoria Kwan
“I’ve had them over to my house for dinner. [read post]