Search for: "House v. Hicks"
Results 41 - 60
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2012, 3:23 am
As the court notes in State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
Every oversight action pending in the House that involves a former official—including, for example, the Judiciary Committee’s past subpoenas to Hicks and Annie Donaldson, former deputy counsel, as well as its recent subpoena to former White House official Rick Dearborn—could potentially be reset to a new default. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 12:42 pm
See Arizona v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:13 am
USA v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
The House impeached Trump, in part, for obstruction based on his directions to these officials and others not to comply with the House’s subpoenas for testimony and documents. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 1:27 am
Hicks argument.By my count, after James Anaya argued Nevada v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 1:00 am
It noted that the House of Lords (in R (Clift) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] UKHL 54) had concluded that being treated differently due to one’s status as a prisoner did not come within the ambit of Article 14 discrimination. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
(More disclosure: I am also one of the lawyers for David Hicks). [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 6:55 am
In 2007, Australian David Hicks, who was picked up in 2001 after training with al Qaeda, pleaded guilty to providing material support to terrorism; the CMCR voided his conviction and sentence on the grounds that, in Al Bahlul v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm
" Fire in the White House! [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:30 am
R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, heard on 28-29 June 2016. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 4:58 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:00 pm
Hicks. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 7:27 am
Explicit photos and videos of the underage child were recovered from the defendant’s house. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 11:14 am
The law is also clear that summary disposition, “either by affirmance or by dismissal for want of a substantial federal question, is a disposition on the merits,” Hicks v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 10:52 am
Hicks and State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm
The Supreme Court ruled yesterday in Ziglar v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:54 am
Hicks, 480 U.S. 321, 328 (1987). [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 1:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:12 am
Perhaps the relevant constitutional distinction is really between cars and houses? [read post]
