Search for: "Howe v. Nelson" Results 41 - 60 of 1,069
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 4:40 am by Beatrice Yahia
Japan asked for the suspension of all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights while an investigation continues, amid ongoing searches for the remaining seven onboard the crash. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:01 am by Stewart Baker
Jim Dempsey and Michael Nelson take us through some of the possibilities: It was all about AI accelerationists v. decelerationists. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It is unclear how courts are supposed to measure any of these goals, or if they could, to know when they have been reached so that racial preferences can end. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm by Greg Lambert
So how are you leveraging the Large Language Models to even improve upon that? [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Berger
Humphrey (and voted to reaffirm in cases like Nelson v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It is asking the Court to overturn the Supreme Court’s 1984 landmark decision in Chevron v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  As we discuss further in Section IV, SB 264 is also the subject of  a constitutional and statutory challenge in the federal courts in the case of Shen v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 9:54 am by Geoff Schweller
The discussion will take place at the 14th and V location of Busboys and Poets in Washington D.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am by Stephen E. Sachs
(In this way the "in lieu of" arguably resembles a non obstante clause, the subject of Caleb Nelson's great work on Preemption.) [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 3:30 am by Eboni Nelson
Eboni Nelson One would be hard pressed to find a law school graduate in the past half century who was not aware of the Williams v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 12:43 pm by Unknown
While the government urged the justices to reverse the Fifth Circuit’s decision against the SEC in its entirety, portions of the government’s merits brief suggest the possibility of a split decision from the justices (SEC v. [read post]