Search for: "IN RE: ARNOLD"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
”As a result, the Court of Appeal had to re-assess the originality of the GUIs at issue by applying the correct test. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Arnold LJ spent the most of his judgment considering the impact of the 10+ years of coexistence, but still concluded that the judge was alive to this and it was for him to decide how much or how little weight to give it. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
” Ms Kireeva’s counsel pointed to the case of Re Kooperman [(1928) 13 B&CR 49] (“Re Kooperman”) as an example of the court granting such relief. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Science Policy (1990); Arnold S. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Weld County School District RE-5J, (D CO, Oct. 19, 2023), a Colorado federal district court refused to dismiss a retaliation claim against a school Superintendent brought by a former high school principal who was demoted and then whose contract was not renewed. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a recent paper, Zachary Liscow, a professor at Yale Law School, and Cass R. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 3:30 am
They’re so confident in their reviews that they link to them above the fold. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 7:18 am
Also, you’re going so [expletive] fast! [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 6:24 am
Some people do that in order to get re-elected. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:58 am
I looked up to photographers like Arnold Newman, Richard Avedon, Irving Penn, David Bailey, and Helmut Newman. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
This post comes to us from Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Arnold proved no less enthusiastic about antitrust than Jackson. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 10:08 am
‘If you’re looking at your options to go back into the workforce, and if salaries and benefits are comparable, why would go into corrections when you could do something less stressful? [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 8:35 pm
In re Arnold, 105 USPQ2d at 1958. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 8:35 pm
In re Arnold, 105 USPQ2d at 1958. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
Twenty Years of The IPKat was published by Oxford University Press in spring 2023.And, speaking of the book, we are happy to re-publish the review that Bill Patry (Mayer Brown) provided of it, as just published by the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:41 am
Therefore, the Court of Appeal was entitled to re-evaluate the issue of obviousness. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 6:05 am
In April, the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues agreed that the pipeline “presents a real and credible threat” to the Great Lakes, called on Canada to “re-examine its support” for Line 5, and recommended that both the United States and Canada decommission the pipeline. [read post]
30 May 2023, 6:11 am
And if you’re interested in seeing your firm’s listings here (and reading some kind BRB job board endorsements), please feel free to reach out! [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 7:07 am
Arnold, J. (2022, January 6). [read post]