Search for: "IN RE: INVENTOR HOLDINGS, LLC "
Results 41 - 60
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
Green Edge Enters., LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:32 pm
The plaintiff was Function Media LLC, a patent holding company owned by husband-and-wife inventors Michael Dean and Lucinda Stone. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 8:50 am
See, Biomedino, LLC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 10:00 pm
Such a result is at odds with a first-inventor-to-file system. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 1:01 am
And the commentators keep saying, well, the jury is in love with inventors and inventors hold the patents and therefore the inventor wins. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 9:07 am
Creative Compounds, LLC, 2019 WL 1216226 (Fed. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:03 am
I’ll note here en banc petition briefing continues in the OTDP/PTA case of In re: Cellect, LLC. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
Dow AgroSciences LLC, 728 F.3d 1324, 1330-31 (Fed. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:33 pm
See In re Hogan, 559 F.2d 595, 606 (CCPA 1977) (noting that requiring such specific disclosures would 'impose an impossible burden on inventors'). . . . [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:01 pm
Allcare Health Management System, Inc. and Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:56 am
In re Donaldson Co., 16 F.3d 1189 (Fed.Cir.1994) (en banc). [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 7:40 pm
In re CuozzoSpeed Techs., LLC, 793 F.3d 1268, 1279 (Fed. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
(In Re Smith International Inc.) [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 8:55 pm
Copyright © Nipper, LLC 2004-2007. [read post]
11 May 2023, 10:12 am
Cir. 2016); Smartdoor Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:20 am
Here's how the CAFC is currently articulating the "reasonably pertinent" prong: "A reference is reasonably pertinent if it, as a result of its subject matter, 'logically would have commended itself to an inventor’s attention in considering his problem.'" Slip Op. at 15, quoting Innovention Toys, LLC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 11:01 am
Innovations, LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 1:11 pm
" Creative Compounds, LLC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:26 pm
., and at least three patent-holding companies??? [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:45 am
’”Commil USA, LLC v. [read post]