Search for: "IT CONCEPTS INCORPORATED v. USA"
Results 41 - 60
of 105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2018, 2:09 pm
The Second District Court of Appeals in Fort Worth has labored long and hard over the appeal taken by the Episcopal Church (USA) and its local diocese and parishes from the July 24, 2015 summary judgment order granted against them by Judge Chupp of the 141st District Court of Tarrant County. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Both proposals rapidly got combined under the abbreviation “One Belt, One Road,” an English translation officially replaced in 2015 by “Belt and Road Initiative” (BRI), supposedly to counter the impression that China owned the concept and to reflect its willingness to welcome others’ participation. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the USA, one of the major musical works collection societies (and there are now four!) [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
Madden v Midland Funding, LLC, 786 F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136, S. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
At In a Crowded Theater, Erica Goldberg suggests that “[c]ataloging some of the instances where courts incorporate math helps illuminate how the Court should proceed in Gill v. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 12:39 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm
, Egbert v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm
, Egbert v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 3:27 am
E.g., Egbert v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 3:32 am
The WCT introduced the specific concepts of the Distribution Right and the Right of Communication to the Public (including the making available concept) but did so in outline terms only. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
" Some 57 instances of infringement were listed in the amended complain including the concept of dilithium crystals and phasers. [read post]
10 May 2016, 6:23 am
(This makes sense since, as we have written before, Emory’s Open Expression Policy incorporates at least the same substantive standards that the First Amendment imposes on public universities, so that the Emory Community has at least the same rights as the communities of the University of Georgia or Georgia State University.) [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:27 pm
” Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:34 am
Corp. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 8:37 pm
Is the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Varsity Brands et al v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 2:32 pm
It is not known yet whether any of the other sitting Justices have recused themselves (two of them did so in the Waccamaw case); the fifth, Justice Kaye Hearn, assumed her seat on the Court after the arguments in the 2009 case.Chief Justice Toal, whose religion is Roman Catholic, is no stranger to the concept of what makes a church "hierarchical. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:59 am
Merchant, Sr. and Southern USA Resources, Inc.Case Number: 13-cv-03879 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia)Case Filed: November 22, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: May 6, 2015 6/30/15 9/28/15 2015-54 In the Matter of Spectrum Concepts, LLC, Donald James Worswick, Michael Nicholas Grosso, and Michael Patrick BrownAdministrative Proceeding File No.: 3-16358Case Filed: January 23, 2015Initial Decision: April 7, 2015Qualifying Judgment/Order: May 20, 2015… [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:55 pm
Thales Visionix v. [read post]
