Search for: "Icon Health & Fitness Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2013, 12:00 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., Docket No. 12-1184; and Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 5:42 am
Cir. 2010) (quoting In re ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 496 F.3d 1374, 1379 (Fed. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 9:45 am
ICON Health &... [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:59 pm
By Andrew Williams -- In less than two weeks, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in two cases involving the Attorney Fees provision of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:14 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. (2014) 134 S.Ct. 1749. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 7:23 am
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., 2021 WL 2188219, No. 20-662-RGA (D. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:02 am
ICON Health & Fitness 134 S. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 9:22 am
By Jason Rantanen Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 5:59 am
ICON Health and Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. and Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 6:21 am
Icon Health and Fitness, Inc. decision to trademark claims is gaining traction among federal appellate courts. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:11 am
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., concerning the proper standard of appellate review of a district court’s award of attorney’s fees in patent infringement cases. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 10:00 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, the Supreme Court overruled Federal Circuit jurisprudence and provided a flexible framework for district courts to grant attorney's fees in "exceptional cases"under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:07 am
Icon Health (Supreme Court 2014) The Patent Act allows district courts to award attorney fees to the prevailing party in “exceptional cases. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.,[1] relaxed the applicable standard in construing the Patent Act’s identical fee-shifting provision and will likely result in a lower bar to the recovery of fees in trademark disputes. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.,[1] relaxed the applicable standard in construing the Patent Act’s identical fee-shifting provision and will likely result in a lower bar to the recovery of fees in trademark disputes. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 3:01 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. attorney’s fees awards are becoming more common in patent cases. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 7:17 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:54 am
On motion of the USPTO Director as intervenor [pdf here], the CAFC remanded to the Board its decision in Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v ERB Industries, Inc., Opposition No. 91264855 (June 27, 2003) [pdf here], because the USPTO raised "legitimate concerns about the Board’s findings on the relatedness between ERB’s goods and iFIT’s services and also wishes to reconsider the decision in light of Naterra International, Inc.… [read post]
