Search for: "In Re Asbestosis Cases" Results 41 - 60 of 104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2018, 2:46 pm by James Innocent
In many cases, workers’ compensation programs address employees’ injuries or deaths from asbestos. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 10:37 am by Mike Gertler
Yes, it is still possible to get compensation for mesothelioma, asbestosis, and other asbestos-related diseases even if you’re not sure where or when you were exposed. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 3:14 am by Jon Gelman
Gestring, who is handling the case, stated that the defendant was one of the owners of a warehouse located at 920 Exchange Street in Rochester. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:37 am by Noble McIntyre
There are exceptions to this in cases involving asbestosis, silicosis and nuclear radiation exposure, so be sure to carefully research your particular situation. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:12 pm by Schachtman
By the time Histrionic Historians was published, Rosner and Markowitz were listed as retained expert witnesses in hundreds if not thousands of cases, in the silicosis MDL, see In re Silica Prods. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
I have focused on Irving Selikoff, because he is such a difficult case. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:27 pm by Schachtman
See, e.g., In re Related Asbestos Cases, 543 F.Supp. 1142 (N.D. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:19 am by Sean Wajert
Flores had concerned a plaintiff suffering from asbestosis. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
Take for example, asbestosis, a diffuse interstitial lung disease caused by chronic, excessive inhalation of asbestos. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:36 am by Schachtman
In the scientific world, most authors recognize that risk, even if real and above baseline, regardless of magnitude, does not support causal attribution in a specific case.[1]  Sir Richard Doll, who did so much to advance the world’s understanding of asbestosis as a cause of lung cancer, issued a caveat about the limits of specific causation inference. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
This was the first case in which a cancer of the colon was established as compensable and it is likely that this case will become an historical precedent. [read post]