Search for: "In Matter of Dance, Inc"
Results 41 - 60
of 265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2021, 9:00 am
From Camelot Banquet Rooms, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 11:35 am
Perhaps the advertiser would have sued the trademark owner for defamation no matter what, but a counterclaim was apropos once the trademark owner decided to dance in court. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 5:52 am
Network Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 12:05 pm
., Inc., 2013 U.S. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
& Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:15 am
Pliva, Inc., 2014 U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 9:42 am
.'" Not a First Amendment violation, the Second Circuit held yesterday in Pharaohs GC, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 8:20 am
RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc., March 6, 2015, Engelmayer, P.). [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 1:39 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITLand Use and Planning
Town Leaders' Comments Showed Racial Animus In Permit Modification Vote Barring Teen Dances
Cine SK8 Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 3:16 pm
LFP, Inc. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 12:50 pm
Facts Blue Nile, Inc. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 11:00 am
Reinhardt Motors, Inc., No. 2:05cv235-CSC (M.D. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
Sirius XM Radio, Inc. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:28 am
Glen Theatre, Inc. upheld a requirement that dancers wear pasties and G-strings, it didn't rely on any theory that nude dancing was non-communicative. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 7:35 am
Project Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 4:30 am
Norah never disappoints when she performs (or in life, for that matter). [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
") In Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 8:33 am
The remainder of the decision is somewhat difficult to follow because it jumps back and forth dancing around but never answering the basic question: If the combination would have been obvious to try, would its natural result also be considered obvious? [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:25 am
” Heritage Resources Inc. v. [read post]
