Search for: "In Re: Breast Implant Product Liability Litigation"
Results 41 - 60
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2020, 10:11 am
Rev. de novo 1, 14 (2009) (“[t]he breast implant litigation was largely based on a litigation fraud. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
Fla. 2009) Silicone – Breast Implants Allison v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Me. 2003); In re Minnesota Breast Implant Litigation, 36 F. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 911 F.2d 941, 958-58 (3d Cir. 1990); In re Silicone Gel Breast Implants Products Liability Litigation, 318 F.Supp.2d 879, 893 (C.D. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 5:18 am
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation, 667 N.W.2d 405 (Minn. 2003). [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
Rev. de novo 1, 14 (2009) (describing plaintiffs’ expert witnesses in silicone litigation as “charlatans”; “[t]he breast implant litigation was largely based on a litigation fraud. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:50 am
In re Breast Implant Cases, 942 F. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 7:00 am
When some of the plaintiff surgeon's patients experienced deflations of their breast implants â€â [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
At bottom, Guinan is another of an increasing number of cases in which what are in reality malpractice cases are being twisted into product liability litigation. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
It’s not that I haven’t noticed you folks over at Weil Gotshal with your competing Product Liability Monitor (link nofollowed), but you need to add some hot sauce and link out if you want to roll with the big boys. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
In fact, product liability law often follows a “needs of the many” approach that supports research, development, and limitation of liability for prescription medical products, where large damage awards can occur in the Wink of an Eye and can result in The Doomsday Machine for such products. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am
Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., Civil Action No. 07–11944–DPW, 2013 WL 4812425 (D. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:59 pm
In re Silicone Gel Breast Implant Product Liability Litigation. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:42 am
(Or, in my old product liability life, we may have wanted women to defend breast implant or hormone replacement therapy cases. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
Mich. 1994) (not “outrageous’ for defendant to deny defect and causation), vacated on other grounds, 91 F.3d 143 (6th Cir. 1996); In re TMJ Implants Products Liability Litigation, 872 F. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Alleged negligent failure to test could not be causal when all product liability claims dismissed. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:06 am
According to SKAPP’s website, the organization enjoyed past support from the Common Benefit Trust, a fund established pursuant to a court order in the Silicone Gel Breast Implant Products Liability litigation. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
Supp. 1151, 1160 (E.D.La. 1997) (noting, in penile implant case, that “any” increased risk suggests that the exposure “may” have played some causal role) In re Breast Implant Litigation, 11 F. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 8:58 am
In re Zoloft Prod. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
The FDA deferred action on a final monograph for PPA, and product marketing continued. [read post]
