Search for: "In Re: Fosamax v." Results 41 - 60 of 107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2012, 10:34 am by Bexis
Thanks to Jim Fraser at Venable for passing along a nice fraudulent misjoinder finding in the Fosamax MDL, Welsh v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:54 am by Bexis
Dec. 12, 2011) (including fraudulent concealment); In re Fosamax Litigation, 2011 WL 5903623, at *8-9 (D.N.J. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by Bexis
Pfizer (femoral stem) Deposition1998-08-31 In re AMS Minnesota Penile Prosthesis Litigation Deposition1998-08-31 In re Guidant Implantable Defibrillators PLL Deposition1998-09-09 Suerth v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Litig., 2000 WL 1222042 (E.D.Pa. 2000)   Fosamax In re Fosamax Prods. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:53 pm by Bexis
Merck (Fosamax) Trial2010-04-23 Bush v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:27 pm by Michelle Yeary
” In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 742 F. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 8:41 am by Bexis
  See In re Fosamax Litigation, 2011 WL 5903623 (D.N.J. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:02 am by Tom Lamb
This second Fosamax multidistrict litigation (MDL) case is IN RE: FOSAMAX (ALENDRONATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm by Bexis
  In re Medtronic, Inc., Sprint Fidelis Leads Products Liability Litigation, 623 F.3d 1200, 1206 (8th Cir. 2010); Fosamax, 2011 WL 5903623, at *5; Wamsley v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm by Bexis
Oct. 21, 2009) (Fosamax – back to England); Miller v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 9:08 am by Michelle Yeary
  In re: Fosamax Products Liability Litigation (Secrest v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
  In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 694 F. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 9:20 am by Bexis
- New EDPA case requiring unsuccessful plaintiff to pay as costs  part of cost of complying with its ediscovery demands - Link.June 16, 2011:  It Should Be An Interesting Couple Of Weeks - Analysis of new Supreme Court Smith v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:15 pm
Essentially the same result occurred in In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 645 F. [read post]