Search for: "In Re: S.A."
Results 41 - 60
of 684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2010, 3:14 am
In re Tequila Cuervo La Rojena, S.A. de C.V., Serial No. 77455224 (June 21, 2010, mailed July 7, 2010) [not precedential].Applicant submitted excerpts from two dictionaries that did not include an entry for "tequini," contending that TEQUINI "is not a recognized word in the English language" and that the smushing together of TEQUILA and MARTINI "is incongruous and would require consumers to think about what meaning is conveyed by TEQUINI. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:22 am
In re Licores Veracruz, S.A. de C.V., Serial No. 77753913 (January 26, 2012) [not precedential].The marks are identical, and therefore a lesser degree of similarity between the involved goods is necessary to support a finding of likely confusion.Examining Attorney Saima Makhdoom maintained that the goods are complementary products that are marketed together for simultaneous consumption. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 7:14 am
Slip op. at 8-12 (discussing Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 5:00 am
" The PTO maintained that the mark falsely suggests a connection with the French cosmetics company L'Oreal, S.A., but it failed to meet its burden to prove that the French company "is of sufficient fame or reputation to consumers in the United States" that such a connection would be presumed. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:16 pm
L’Oreal,S.A., 129 F.3d 588, 595 (Fed. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:09 pm
The case is styled In re Pacific Drilling S.A., et al., and is case number 17-13193 pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:09 pm
The case is styled In re Pacific Drilling S.A., et al., and is case number 17-13193 pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 3:03 am
When that application was refused under Section 2(e)(1), Applicant Southeastern Dermatology, S.A. appealed. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
In In re Optimal U.S. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:03 am
This duty extends throughout the length of the voyage, and does not cease at each port of call, only to resume when the passenger re-embarks. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:03 am
This duty extends throughout the length of the voyage, and does not cease at each port of call, only to resume when the passenger re-embarks. [read post]
25 May 2012, 11:46 am
The company is then alleged to have re-packaged the telephones to conceal their Cuban origin. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 11:09 am
See Empagran S.A. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 5:13 pm
In re Richemont Int'l, S.A., Serial Nos. 76413051 and 76413157 (June 22, 2006) [not citable].In a nutshell, Applicant Richemont was attempting to register "the configuration of a watch as it makes [a] pivoting motion," so that the face of the watch may be placed directly against the wrist, making the back of the watch visible. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 8:08 am
L'Oreal, S.A., 129 F.3d 588, 595 (Fed. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:32 pm
S.A. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 12:40 am
Seguros del Magisterio, S.A. has now become the first company authorized to compete with the Instituto Nacional de Seguros (INS).Costa Rica’s pension fund supervisory authority (SUPEN), also temporarily charged with supervising the insurance industry until a separate superintendency can be fully developed, recently authorized Seguros del Magisterio to sell insurance products to all sectors of the Costa Rican population (the company was previously authorized to sell only… [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:11 pm
You think at first glance you solve a problem here, but the reality is you’re just creating another one somewhere else. [read post]
7 May 2015, 5:39 am
[Refusal to register Joe Momma's Place for restaurant services, in view of the registered mark JOE MAMMAS for "catering for the provision of food and beverages; catering of food and drinks; contract food services; food preparation; serving food and drinks; serving of food and drink/beverages"].In re Ecopetrol S.A, Serial No. 85384900 (April 23, 2015) [not precedential]. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 3:40 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of MAXGAIN for "natural supplements for male enhancement" in light of the registered mark MAXIMUM GAIN for food, herbal, and other supplements].In re Shackleton S.A., Serial No. 85450227 (October 15, 2013) [not precedential]. [read post]
