Search for: "In Re Adoption of Cox" Results 41 - 60 of 177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2019, 10:44 am by Schachtman
Calif. 2007) (excluding virtually all relevant expert witness testimony proffered to support claims that ordinary dosages of these COX-2 inhibitors caused cardiovascular events). [5]  In re Viagra Products Liab. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 10:05 am by Stephen Bates
Nixon ordered Cox to withdraw the subpoenas and accept transcripts instead; Cox refused. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
  The political economy of international standard setting in financial reporting: how the United States led the adoption of IFRS across the world. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
" The appellate court said that as it stood, Cox wasn't entitled to rely on safe harbor because it did very little (if anything) even when told about repeat offenders, re-affirming the jury decision that sided with BMG and awarded $25 million against Cox when they found the broadband carrier liable for piracy by its subscribers, even if over turning that decision. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 9:34 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Formal articles of impeachment were adopted a week later. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 4:02 am by SHG
In the murders of transgender people, they’re slightly worse. 55% rather than 59%. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:53 am by Ben
Here, Cox formally adopted a repeat infringer 'policy,' but ..... made every effort to avoid reasonably implementing that policy. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:37 am by Ben
Here, Cox formally adopted a repeat infringer 'policy,' but ..... made every effort to avoid reasonably implementing that policy. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:59 am by John Delaney and Aaron Rubin
In the appeal of the dispute between BMG and Cox Communications regarding Cox’s liability for its users’ alleged downloading of copyrighted material using Cox’s Internet service, the Fourth Circuit heard oral argument last year and a decision should come down this year. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Instead, as former SEC Chair Chris Cox put it, Section 162(m) “deserves a place in the museum of unintended consequences. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 9:47 am by karen
The Problems With Proposals to Blindly Apply Offline Regulation to Online Speech We’re still in the early stages of this latest round of policymaking. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am by Marty Lederman
By Adam Cox, Marty Lederman and Cristina RodriguezOne month ago, on September 5, the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Elaine Duke, rescindeda June 2012 memorandum issued by her predecessor, Secretary Janet Napolitano, which had established the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, commonly known as “DACA. [read post]