Search for: "In Re Application of Griffiths" Results 41 - 60 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2023, 1:34 am by Tessa Shepperson
While these do differ depending on the situation, the likelihood is that if you’re caught lying, your application will be rejected. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
KKR Financial Holdings LLC  (here) and the Delaware Chancery Court’s January 2016 court decision in the In re Trulia Shareholder litigation (here). [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
  The House counters that they’re misreading those statutes and that therefore there aren’t any appropriated funds for major parts of the project.In both cases, the Executive branch is arguing that the House (or its Committee) lacks Article III standing to sue. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
With what’s left of Thanksgiving coming up, we are obligated as denizens of the Internet to do a post on things we’re thankful for. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 7:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Each credit has its own eligibility requirements and application process. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
In the McGahn oral argument, Judge Thomas Griffith, an appointee of George W. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:55 am by Josh Blackman
And I believe that the Court wrongly departs from Griffith regardless. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:06 am by INFORRM
The facts In this case, an application by Brevan Howard for an interim non-disclosure order against Reuters had been heard and granted by Mr Justice Popplewell in March 2017. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike’s Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
If we're lucky.)Flybys (in no particular order or trajectory, as usual) . . .Power space: We've discussed space solar power and the NSSO Interim Assessment, now Col. [read post]
25 May 2007, 12:30 pm
As promised, Paul Breed at Unreasonable Rocket has posted his application to FAA for an experimental flight permit; including his cover letters. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am by Frank Cranmer
At the present time, the Diocese of Guildford is advertising the position within their dioceses, and the applicant information here gives a fuller appreciation of the scope of the role. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
These Patent Office patent application rejections require inventors to continually re-submit their patent application and pay thousands in additional government filing fees, before their patent application are ultimately turned down. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:13 am by GuestPost
  It was not until the case of Johnston and Ors v Ireland [Application No.9697/82] that the discrimination of illegitimate children in Ireland was aired in an international forum. [read post]