Search for: "In Re General Coffee Corp." Results 41 - 60 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
,” you’re right. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by Sarah Glassmeyer
Pop in on student organization meetings even if you’re not the faculty advisor. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
  These cases—denoted as dots falling above the dashed line in Figures 1 and 2—could generate protective filings but are not included in the above estimates. [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:59 am
  Preemption is like his morning, afternoon, and evening coffee.) [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:55 am
In re Advanced Armament Corp., LLC, Serial No. 77770899 (November 29, 2013) [not precedential].The examining attorney relied on various Internet pages and media articles regarding use of guns and/or silencers, and other material regarding the Statute of Liberty. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am by Eric
  Unfortunately, the Court did not set forth any sort of general approach to deciding claims of this type, leaving lower courts to sort out the issues in later cases. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 10:41 am by Greg Mersol
Starbucks Corp., Case No. 122 (June 26, 2013), the Court of Appeals of New York issued two rulings. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 11:00 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  If you read just one class certification decision this year, Professor Coffee recommends Judge Rosenthal’s memorandum opinion in In re: Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 4:08 am by Broc Romanek
If you're not a member of CompensationStandards.com, get this issue for free when you try a no-risk trial for 2013. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:50 am by Michelle Yeary
  Actually, if you know those things, as my grandmother would say – that and a nickel will get you a cup of coffee (she’s 95 and unfamiliar with Starbuck’s prices). [read post]