Search for: "In Re Judicial Ethics Opinion 2011-3"
Results 41 - 60
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2019, 11:20 am
” To put an even finer point on it, this week Trump himself told reporters, “We’re fighting all of the subpoenas. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
That means that sometimes you will have an opinion or produce an insight with respect to which there may be objection or disagreement. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Now They’re Running for Office. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Jan. 18, 2013) (failure to cite relevant judicial precedent constitutes an ethical offense) In science, the development of the systematic review, in large measure, has been supported by the widespread recognition that studies cannot be evaluated with post hoc, subjective evaluative criteria. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
POTENTIAL FOR DELETERIOUS CONSEQUENCES 1) Has Judicial Discretion already occupied the Field? [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:40 am
” (These decisions are excluded from coverage to the extent they decide past issues in specific cases, E.O. 13892 § 2(c)(iv); they’re covered only to the extent an agency relies on them for future effect.) [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:08 am
3 Can such civic spaces exist beyond the direct control and management of the Party-State apparatus? [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm
Dubious Scholarship The more serious problem with Cranor’s article is not his ethically strained pronouncements about financial interests, but the dubious scholarship he and his colleagues advance to thwart judicial gatekeeping of even more dubious expert witness opinion testimony. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Further, as so-called “targeted killings” become more controversial with time, I believe there are some decision-makers within the Executive Branch who actually wouldn’t mind the added comfort of judicial imprimatur on their decisions. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
”[3] Egilman’s claims about silica, however, were never supported in this article or elsewhere. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm
What is admissible, or not, are opinions of duly qualified expert witnesses, who explain and justify the epistemic warrant for their opinions. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
Re AB: Termination of pregnancy. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 6:11 pm
Consortium for Peace & Ethics, No. 2012-11/11. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
OPINION SUE WALKER, Justice. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Judges write opinions, in which they give reasons for their conclusions. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
See note 9, infra (discussing such comments in In re Franklin National Bank Securities Litigation and Bank of Dearborn v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
Supreme Court.[6] One influential re-articulation came in Wisconsin v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
It’s been a fun ride, but we’re becoming increasingly aware that our profligate use of electrons cannot continue indefinitely. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 6:54 am
Disgust that this lawsuit has consumed judicial resources for years? [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:54 am
Not So Easy - bit.ly/z5GZUe (Tam Harbert) Hacker Points to Weakness in LexisNexis Concordance - bit.ly/zjdXby (Evan Koblentz) Landmark E-Discovery Decision Recognizes the Appropriateness of Predictive Coding Review - bit.ly/yiwBVk (Squire Sanders) Electronic Medical Records: Legal Risks of Going Paperless - bit.ly/yLrr5x (Alicia Gallegos) Employment Discrimination Protocols for Discovery: They’re Coming - bit.ly/ycL6GF (Daniel… [read post]
