Search for: "In Re Pennington" Results 41 - 60 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2019, 6:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Chances are, they’re in breach of that duty, in ways that are very obvious and easy to prove.This is where the developer is most vulnerable. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:00 am by Site Admin
First of all, I am going to be speaking for the older adult ministry as part of the Pennington Presbyterian Church in Pennington, New Jersey. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 7:54 am by Nathan Matias
Last semester, I taught a Princeton undergrad/grad seminar on the craft, politics, and ethics of behavioral experimentation. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:55 am
Is that supposed to be some sort of racial analysis, like that if you believe Phil Mickelson, you're a carrier of the infection of white privilege? [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 6:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
Here is how the CFPB describes the status of the enforcement action initiated under prior CFPB head Cordray against the National Collegiate Student Loan Trusts and Transworld Systems Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 10:00 pm
In re Pennington Seed, Inc., 466 F.3d 1053, 1057, 80 USPQ2d 1758, 1761 (Fed. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Among the lectures posted by on YouTube by HD-ULisboa is Iberian jurists and the rights of the native Americans in South America by Kenneth Pennington, Catholic University of America. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 7:57 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Tejas Narechania's new paper, Certiorari, Universality, and a Patent Puzzle, forthcoming in Michigan Law Review argues that a major identifying factor for the Supreme Court's interest in patent cases is a field split: an area where a particular patent law doctrine plays out differently in patent law than in other fields of law where it is used. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 10:08 am by JD Hull
Dan Hull in 1967 with the Pennington Twins. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 12:56 am by Florian Mueller
So far, my impression is that the court could easily decide either way, but what would be in the interest of justice is that Samsung gets the chance to make its "article of manufacture" case before a new jury (a jury would be needed in any event for the re-retrial, so justice would be available at almost no incremental cost here). [read post]