Search for: "In The Matter Of: E.R"
Results 41 - 60
of 126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2017, 2:24 pm
It would appear that parties expected him to take these two matters into account in any award. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Bater, [1950] 2 All E.R. 458 (C.A.), Hanes v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:13 am
Baldwin, [1925] All E.R. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 2:14 pm
Baxendale (1854), 9 Exch. 341, 156 E.R. 145 (Eng. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 11:07 am
E.R. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:44 pm
On November 26, 2015 the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) issued what may prove to be its most important copyright ruling to date in terms of its effect on tariffs, the tariff making process, the Copyright Board and the copyright bar. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:03 am
(Forbes)Here's an update on the Access Copyright Hearing for a Post-Secondary tariff that supposedly was concluded on January 22, 2016.I attended to hear the final oral arguments in Access Copyright’s Post-Secondary tariff hearing at the Copyright Board on Friday, January 22, 2016. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 8:40 pm
., [1999] 4 All E.R. 342 (Q.B.), where a failure to act once aware itself became a form of defamation because it could be perceived to be a deliberate act of approval, adoption, promotion or ratification. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm
Veley (1850), 12 Q.B. 328, 116 E.R. 891, at p. 407, as approved and adopted in Ontario English Catholic Teachers’ Assn. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:32 pm
& K. 98 at 103, 39 E.R. 618 at 620-21:The foundation of this rule is not difficult to discover. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:23 am
In re E.R. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:49 pm
Mildmay, [1937] 3 All E.R. 402, at p. 13 S.C.R.]. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
In this post, I’ll first elaborate on what I understand the concern to be, and then explain why I believe that the consequence that Justice Breyer hypothesizes, while certainly a valid matter to consider, does not in fact arise and need not constrain development of Confrontation Clause doctrine.I think what Justice Breyer is responding to is basically this: Over 200 years, a complex web of hearsay law has been worked out, reflecting judgments of what hearsay should be… [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
In this post, I’ll first elaborate on what I understand the concern to be, and then explain why I believe that the consequence that Justice Breyer hypothesizes, while certainly a valid matter to consider, does not in fact arise and need not constrain development of Confrontation Clause doctrine.I think what Justice Breyer is responding to is basically this: Over 200 years, a complex web of hearsay law has been worked out, reflecting judgments of what hearsay should be… [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:05 am
In the course of the welding fume litigation, defense counsel sought underlying data and documentation from a study published by Dr. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 12:45 pm
Int’l Bulkcarriers S.A., [1980] 1 All E.R. 213). [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
Int’l Bulkcarriers S.A., [1980] 1 All E.R. 213). [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
Int’l Bulkcarriers S.A., [1980] 1 All E.R. 213). [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Even before the Statute of Monopolies (1623), the Crown rewarded an inventor with a limited monopoly in exchange for public disclosure of “a new invention and a new trade within the kingdom … or if a man hath made a new discovery of any thing”: Clothworkers of Ipswich Case (1653), Godb. 252, 78 E.R. 147, at p. 148, where the court went on to say that the effect of an unjustified monopoly was “to take away free-trade, which is the birthright of every… [read post]
