Search for: "In re: C.R." Results 41 - 60 of 121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Polius (2009), 196 C.R. (2d) 288 (C.S.J Ont.). [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 8:49 am by Administrator
Wust (1998), 125 C.C.C. (3d) 43, 53 C.R.R. (2d) 306, 17 C.R. (5th) 45, 1998 CanLII 5492 (B.C.C.A.). [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:42 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
The consolidated cases are In Re: Coloplast Corp Pelvic Support System Products Liability Litigation, 12-md-2387, U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
”  In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation, 2013 WL 174416, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The learned intermediary rule could be Bob Dylan (I know, we’re showing our age, here). [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 1:27 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
None of the women who received traditional vaginal prolapse surgery had to undergo re-operation. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:37 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
None of the women who received traditional vaginal prolapse surgery had to undergo re-operation. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
In fact, they’re aided in their Bronson-esque investigative methods by a legal system that essentially puts suspects at their mercy. [read post]