Search for: "In re: Clay Means" Results 41 - 60 of 295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2010, 4:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2010) (quoting In re Clay, 966 F.2d 656, 658-59 (Fed. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:17 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Aaron Clay, No. 107,038 (Wyandotte)Direct appeal; Felony murderCarol Longenecker-SchmidtFailure to give lesser-included offense instructionsImproper eyewitness ID instructionState v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 6:29 am
On yesterday's Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Show — audio and transcript, here — here's the part where Trump credits Putin with genius (which his antagonists predictably take to mean that he's siding with Putin!) [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 1:31 pm by Andrew & Danielle Mayoras
"Act now, avoid trouble laterIgnoring your estate plan can land your children with ill-suited guardians or give them a pile of cash that they're too young to handle, she said.If you become incapacitated before you die, it can mean that your care could be dictated by a stranger -- or even an enemy. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 8:43 pm by admin
When budgets get pushed to the maximum, options become fewer, and I for one, am expecting that when the gasoline prices reach $5 per gallon, that it will “fuel” bankruptcy, meaning that we’ll start to see a bigger wave of bankruptcy filings than we’re already seeing. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 7:49 am by Derek Allen
I just finished reading Chuck Klosterman’s I Wear the Black Hat, a book that deals with what we mean when we call someone a villian. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 9:47 am by James Innocent
That kind of thinking is dangerous and stupid, meaning it fits nicely into the general drunk-driving mindset. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 6:59 am
It’s not entirely clear what this means if you’re trying to calculate what happens to the matter once it’s inside the event horizon. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 4:46 am by Steven M. Gursten
  This does not mean that in 90 degrees or above a person is not uncomfortably warm, as Clay says; it is simply that the helmet is not the cause. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:20 pm
New Meaning: There has been zero attrition. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:42 am by admin
Re-enactment of the universal helmet law should be considered in states where it has been repealed.” The second part of Clay’s statement (that helmets increase the incidence of accidents due to limited vision and hearing) is also contradicted by the research on this issue. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But as long as we’re asking what “the Framers [did and] did not want,” let’s look at the odd drafting history of the Presidential Selection clauses and at the final approved language. [read post]