Search for: "In re: Trade Secret, Inc v." Results 41 - 60 of 651
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2009, 2:27 pm
That means you have, at minimum, (1) a bona fide trade secret and (2) evidence of actual or threatened "misappropriation" of the trade secret. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:30 am
In a decision that will have ripple effects in many trade secret and IP disputes, the federal magistrate in the Apple v. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 8:49 am
2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, July 31, 2009 Jasco Tools, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 8:00 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
Warning: This post touches upon the incredibly dry subject of trade secrets preemption.If you are still reading and you're not a lawyer, I am really impressed. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:19 pm
As long as you hire good attorneys, there's no way you're going to get spanked for two attorney's fees awards of a half-million dollars each (in two different lawsuits) as a result of your decision to file a trade secrets lawsuit against a competitor that hired some of your employees, right? [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 8:44 am by Eric Goldman
Caliber * Trade Secret Owner Penalized For ‘Specious’ Misappropriation Lawsuit–BTS v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 1:06 pm
(Montana Supreme Court, July 24, 2018, Associated Management Services, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 7:15 am by Barry Sookman
An example is Article 18.78 which sets minimum standards for trade secret protection among TPP partners. [read post]
1 May 2018, 10:29 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
RiddellSports, Inc., 242 F.3d 567, 577 (5th Cir. 2001) (citationsomitted); see McCaig v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 10:28 pm by Sme
Contract/Noncompete/Trade Secret/Wrongful Termination *Retiree, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 12:26 am by Sme
Contract/Noncompete/Trade Secret/Wrongful TerminationFirst Western Capital Management Co. v. [read post]