Search for: "In re Care & Treatment of Johnson" Results 41 - 60 of 180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2008, 4:21 am
AID=/20080720/NEWS/807200378&;amp;referrer=FRONTPAGECAROUSEL [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 10:39 pm
Dial says she couldn't make payments herself because she spends more than $150 a month for other treatment and insulin. [read post]
21 May 2015, 11:41 am
  Id.Defendant EES is an Ohio corporation with its principal place of business in Ohio, and co-defendant Johnson & Johnson is a New Jersey corporation with its principal place of business in New Jersey. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 3:22 pm
And certainly, over the years, medical device manufacturers have elevated our health care system to new heights, promoting life-saving therapy and demanding higher standards of care. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:03 am by Layla Kuhl
In separate orders (142568, 142566 & (67)), the Court granted leave to appeal in In re Mays, Minors. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
McKinney School of Law, Controlling Health Care Spending: More Patient 'Skin in the Game? [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by Erik Lundegaard
Klee Tuchin Bogdanoff & Stern, Small/mid-size Law Firm, Los Angeles, CA: Led a successful effort to obtain equal treatment for same-sex married couples under the Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:10 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Pfizer and Moderna published theirs on September 17, AstraZeneca followed suit on September 19, and Johnson & Johnson released theirs a few days later. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 2:12 pm by admin
January 4, 2022 – For employers that are requiring vaccinations, employers must ensure that their employees are fully vaccinated, meaning that employees have and have received either two doses of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine or one dose of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine by January 4, 2022, unless they qualify for an exemption. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:37 pm by Schachtman
The defendants, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc., designed, made, marketed, and sold pelvic mesh medical devices for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
 This was upheld by the Court of Appeal.Brian Cordery reminded the audience of the general principles relating to amendments set out in Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100 and Johnson v Gore Wood [2000] UKHL 65 which prevent re-litigation in circumstances not amounting to strict res judicata. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 9:42 am by Simmons Hanly Conroy
On June 26, another defendant, Johnson & Johnson, settled with the state of New York for $263 million and agreed to stop making opioids. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
A bunch of courts also view Campbell as killing off punitive damages class actions: In re Simon II Litigation, 407 F.3d 125, 139 (2d Cir. 2005) (Campbell mandates decertification of punitive damages class); Johnson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
That means two things: (1) it's still ethical to do the type of double-blinded controlled studies that the FDA requires (because that doesn't involve withholding standard of care treatment from study subjects, which is a no-no), and (2) there's more patients to be cured - and money to be made - if you could only say what you knew. [read post]