Search for: "In re Charles B."
Results 41 - 60
of 851
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2018, 11:21 am
I'll never hear "Bennie and the Jets" the same way again:Oh, but they're weird and they're wonderfulOh, Bennie, she's really keenShe's got electric bootsA mohair suitYou know I read it in a magazineB-B-B-Bennie and the JetsOh, but he's weird and he's wonderful/Jeffrey Toobin is really keen/He's got electric news/Contemptuous boos/It's the best news I've ever seen.... [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 1:32 pm
But, it does serve as a reminder: the fate of Charles Hynes is still unresolved.As now former Kings County District Attorney Charles Hynes entered the twilight of his last term, he found himself engaged in an increasingly contentious re-election campaign. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:08 am
Katherine B. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:35 am
Sometimes they’re great. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 8:32 am
See In re Bose Corp., 580 F.3d 1240, 91 U.S.P.Q.2d 1938, 1941 (Fed. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:46 am
In Re D.R., 2011-Ohio-4755 (7th Dist.) [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:52 am
May 08, 2007):The standards for proper service as set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 are incorporated into Rule 12(b)(5). 5B Charles Allen Wright & Arthur R. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 8:04 pm
Rothman, John B. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm
" We suggested she contact the Historical Society of the New York Courts and the Charles B. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:53 pm
They're making the journey from St. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:25 pm
” See Sections 6(c)(3)(A) and (B) of H.R. 1249. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:25 am
Res. 111 disapproving the arbitration rule under the CRA. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 12:58 pm
The fundamental principle of the Constitution is that it shouldn’t matter what you‘re charged with ñ you have the right to a fair trial. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
Gross, John B. and Alice R. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 1:56 pm
For one thing, there are a lot fewer plans available, but they're up to 116% higher, which is nice.For another, it's likely that fewer agents will be helping folks sign up for on-Exchange (ie subsidized) plans. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 2:30 pm
[Dewey B Strategic] [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
Sorry that we're a bit late on this one, but better later than never! [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 8:59 am
There is no plan B. [read post]
20 Feb 2006, 1:33 pm
In last week's posts on termination and extension of the automatic stay under 362(c)(3) and (4), Part I discussed notice and procedure issues, and Part II discussed how one court in In re Charles, 334 B.R. 207, approached the burdens of proof for invoking the presumptive lack of good faith for purposes of 362(c)(3)(B). [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:48 am
For a case in which a parent was ordered not to engage in anti-homosexuality speech, see this post, about In re E.L.M.C. [read post]
