Search for: "In re Elevator Antitrust Litigation"
Results 41 - 47
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am
Generally, everyone benefits when litigants settles their cases rather than fighting to the bitter end. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
Confounding in the Lower Courts To some extent, lower courts, especially in the federal court system, got the message: Rule 702 required them to think about the evidence, and to consider threats to validity. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 8:56 am
One of the most frequently violated and litigated federal employment laws, the FLSA generally requires that U.S. employers pay nonexempt employees at least $7.25 per hour for all regular compensable hours worked, plus time and one-half their regular rates, including commissions, bonuses and incentive pay, for hours worked beyond 40 per week. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am
It has become the symbol of the country’s capacity to hold itself to elevating standards, to vault over its present biases and inherited inequalities. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm
Which of these three options is going to get President Obama re-elected: (a) 500,000 new jobs, (b) expanding health care for 10 million additional Americans, or (c) Seventh Circuit Judge Diane Wood? [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 10:24 am
Which of these three options is going to get President Obama re-elected: (a) 500,000 new jobs, (b) expanding health care for 10 million additional Americans, or (c) Seventh Circuit Judge Diane Wood? [read post]
