Search for: "In re Mark C. (1992)" Results 41 - 60 of 214
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm by admin
Well, soon the pandemic of Trump Flu will come to a close. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:08 am
 With that in mind we arrived at a tentative answer: yes--but that "yes" requires a re conception of democratic practice in ways alien to liberal democracies that center notions of "representation" and "election" in the construction of their own democratic universe. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
’” Outhouse argued that In re Scholastic, Inc., 23 U.S.P.Q.2d 1774, 1992 WL 215313 (T.T.A.B. 1992), supported its claim. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON TAGNETICS, INC., Appellant, v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 11:10 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
The opposition had been filed against the patent as a whole based on Article 100(a) and (c) EPC (lack of novelty and inventive step, unallowable extension).III. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Ray Dowd
Dep't of Health & Human Res., 532 U.S. 598, 603–05, 121 S.Ct. 1835, 149 L.Ed.2d 855 (2001) ). [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 8:25 am by MBettman
And the case of In Re M.B. is distinguishable because that case dealt with gifts to the child, not child support pursuant to judicial decree. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:51 am by MBettman
Said, 63 Ohio St.3d 690 (1992) (“[A]ctual malice requires consciousness of the near certainty (or otherwise stated “great probability”) that substantial harm will be caused by the tortious behavior. . . . [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 10:12 am by Elizabeth Allan
Res. 549, introduced in 1992, conditioned a proposed F-15 sale on Saudi Arabia ceasing its boycott of Israel. [read post]