Search for: "In re State Bar of Tex. "
Results 41 - 60
of 522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Short of a trial on the merits, there could be additional motions for summary judgment, but there might also be a settlement.POSSIBLE SUPREME COURT REVIEW Barring a prompt resolution of the dispute by settlement, however, there is a good chance that the case will first be taken to the Texas Supreme Court, and if the high court agrees to hear it, it is likely that one or more of the legal issues might get decided differently by the court that has the last word on matters of Texas… [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
Perez No. 13-0573 (Tex. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Short of a trial on the merits, there could be additional motions for summary judgment, but there might also be a settlement.POSSIBLE SUPREME COURT REVIEW Barring a prompt resolution of the dispute by settlement, however, there is a good chance that the case will first be taken to the Texas Supreme Court, and if the high court agrees to hear it, it is likely that one or more of the legal issues might get decided differently by the court that has the last word on matters of Texas… [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:51 am
McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals, 672 F.3d 372 (5th Cir. 2012), holding that preemption barred the fraud on the FDA exception to the Texas statute (Tex. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
TILA Claim In his petition, Long alleged that appellees failed to comply with the Truth in Lending Act in their disclosures to him regarding the home-equity loan.[3] In their motion for summary judgment, appellees alleged that Long's claim failed as a matter of law on two grounds: (1) because appellees did not violate TILA, and (2) because the claim was barred by the applicable statute of limitations.[3] On appeal, Long challenges only the first ground and does not… [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
In the case before the supreme court, some conspiracy claims were found to be time-barred based on the nature of the underlying tort, but the record did not establish that all were so barred. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
Tex. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:32 pm
State Bar R. art. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 1:40 pm
Tex. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
Res judicata barred litigating it in another suit. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 3:20 pm
TEX CP. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:24 am
See Dep’t of Research & Analysis, State Bar of Tex., 2015 Hourly Fact Sheet 13 (2016), ECF No. 79-10. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:48 pm
After all, the State Bar Act, in Tex. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:37 am
Thanks to the Texas Supreme Court immunity grant and rule 91a approval, the worst in the bar stand to profit some more from their malfeasance if they get sued. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
See In re D.W.G., 391 S.W.3d 154, 164 (Te [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
And an active one it is indeed, with the state supreme court asked to weigh in on a regular basis. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
TEX. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 4:00 pm
’” from Tex Parte. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 11:33 pm
at 9.In mid-2014, Guerrero contacted BANA to resolve his delinquent loan and to re-apply for another loan modification. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
” (Tex. [read post]
